Author Archives: myself313

Truth vs Fiction – The Rumors Campaign Part 2

1 Reply

Thank you, Corey Miller, for your input about the 2025 IH BOD Election – Rumors Campaign.

For interested members, here is Corey Miller’s email sent today, December 14, 2025.

———- Forwarded message ———
From: Corey Miller corey@bmhtaxes.com
Date: Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 10:19 AM
Subject: The Truth vs Fiction
To: Corey Miller corey@bmhtaxes.com

Dear Members,

Lauren and I have owned in IH for 32 years. During that time, I have only sent 2 emails, including this one, to the whole community (not including any sent as the Treasurer). The first was several weeks ago regarding online voting for IH, and now this one regarding the intentional misleading rumors that are being spread.

I do not have any agenda, I do not Hunt or ride, and only wish to share what I know to be facts.

  1. Our fees will not go to $1,000 per month. There is no basis for this rumor. Should any BOD attempt to do this, the Membership would be able recall the board.
  2. We are not going to hire 30 new employees. We currently have 6 full time and 6 part time employees.
  3. There has been no discussion regarding paving all the roads. At the Annual Meeting several years ago, the Member voted against paving more roads.
  4. The Outback has not been destroyed. I have not been in the outback for about 10 years, and when I heard this rumor, I took my Polaris and rode through the whole outback. It has never looked better – please go see for yourself! The quail hunt areas are a very small portion of the outback.
  5. IH will not become a commercial quail operation – we are an HOA. The revised Quail program revitalized the program that was here when Lauren and I first bought. There was a Quail Barn at that time. Members were and are allowed to bring guests, to shoot with the Member. Keep in mind, quail hunters purchase birds raised by quail operators and bring them to IH to be released and hunted. The hunters are not shooting IH wildlife, such as our deer, but are bringing more wildlife to IH with the birds that are not shot.
  6. The pictures that were shared at Sandy Steinruck’s “secret” meeting Saturday night- showing facebook posts of a non-member’s experience hunting at IH. This person was the paid guide – not a hunter. Shame on those who did not do their due diligence and are trying to use this misinformation as a reason to stop quail hunting.
  7. Also shared at the Steinruck secret meeting, was a list of the people to vote for and those not to vote for. I am on the Bad Boy list! Three of the other Bad Boys were listed because they belong to Pine Creek (I do not – way above my pay grade). Is belonging to another club a crime? Thanks to these individuals, Pine Creek is giving IH dining room tables and chairs. Also, these individuals donated to the new Quail Barn, even though their membership in Pine Creek allows them to hunt Quail at no additional charge.
  8. Two on the Bad Boy list are there because they are friends with people who donated to the quail barn. Seriously?
  9. One person on the Bad Boy list is an Equestrian – why would that matter, unless they also want to prohibit horses.
  10. The quail barn is not noisy and does not smell. Go see for yourself.
  11. Many of the people on the approved to vote for, want to keep IH natural. What does this mean? Tear up the paved road? Stop eradicating invasive plants? Let our trails and fire breaks become overgrown? Should we stop maintaining our buildings and equipment?
  12. The BOD’s actions followed our governing documents. The construction of the quail barn follows our Declaration of Restrictions Article 5, Section 1.

If you have already given your proxy and wish to change it to someone else, (copy attached) mcomplete a new proxy, be sure to date it, and send it to the office by tomorrow.

Thank you for your time and reading this lengthy email.

Sincerely,

Corey

2025 IH BOD Election – The Rumors Campaign

Leave a reply

I am including below the email and the attachment that David Bass emailed today to all members.

As a candidate, I attended this “Meet and Greet” today and was asked by a few members about another rumor being distributed around.

These members were worried about a “conspiracy” by a “group” to transform Indian Hammock into another Pine Creek.
No one of the worried members could provide a single name of any of this “group “ members, nor who initiated the distribution of this troubling “information.“

We have a better deal than Pine Creek’s members, and only a few of our members can afford the membership cost as currently in Pine Creek.
Talking to some of these wealthy members, they showed a preference for the Indian Hammock compared to Pine Creek. Otherwise, they said they would move to Pine Creek.

I could not find anyone who wants to increase the club staff to 30 employees even if the monthly fee goes up to $1000, the numbers quoted by some worried members.

I ask for anyone who can provide names and written information regarding such troubling claims to provide them.

Monthly fees will increase, unavoidably, due to inflation and improvements in Indian Hammock. Still, everyone I talked to wants such increases to be minimal, even if it means less improvement.

Members must be cautious about such frightening rumors and use common sense to decide why they are being spread and by whom.

I will gladly discuss this issue with any member wishing to do so.

David Etzion
Lot 246


From the desk of David Bass, President

This message is being sent to all members.

Today I attended the “Meet and Greet” your Board candidates pancake breakfast graciously donated and hosted by Jason and George Stark.  Thank you to them for donating and volunteering to set up this member friendly format where members got to meet and get to know the board candidates.

I also received this concerning email from a new member who has permitted me to share with you.  I have heard similar complaints but no one before now has come forward to name names.  None of the statements referenced in the attachment are factual.  They are absolute hogwash.

Our annual member’s meeting is about a week away and many members are talking with other members about who they will vote for or who to give their proxy to.  This is always an important decision and I encourage all members to vote based on the facts (and not someone else’s statement or opinion). 

Rumors, allegations, disparaging statements, or unsubstantiated statements about board candidates (spread by other board candidates or members) is disappointing and further escalates community friction.  Undocumented comments about board candidates by board candidates does call into question the integrity of individuals who aspire to be our leaders. It just isn’t necessary and I hope that we can move beyond that kind of behavior.

If you have questions about board candidates or want direct answers on any of the statements made by other members about a candidate, I would encourage you to reach out directly to the candidate. There is no better way to get the answers you’re looking for than to directly ask the candidate assuring that someone else’s agenda does not influence yours without the facts.

If anyone else would like to share their experience, please let me know and I will be happy to discuss your concerns.  

As always, if there are any statements pertaining to the board’s actions this past year, I am happy to explain anything.

I hope to see you all at both the 50th Anniversary Members Dinner on the 18th and the Annual Members meeting on Sunday January 19th.

-Dave

The attachment David Bass refers to

 From: Jon Albertson <glf5@me.com>
Subject: Jon Albertson Lot 47
Date: Jan 10, 2025 at 6:18 PM

To: david.bass@ihammock.net

David,

I’m relatively new to the Indian Hammock Hunt & Riding Club. Please help me clarify statements from Tom Brooks about the hunt committee, quail barn and Board of Directors I struggle to understand:

The quail barn was built outside of “all” the rules absent “any” input from membership.

The board hired an attorney to change the bylaws to accomplish alleged quail barn caper.

Quail barn is much larger than the original quail barn and will house many thousands of birds.

“Anyone” now allowed to hunt quail at Indian Hammock.

Owner (member or not) of a hunting dog shot (dead or injured) at Indian hammock will be paid $5,000.00 (if I didn’t love dogs or if this bounty applied to cats I’d consider getting in the business!)?

Quail barn is phase one of this conspiracy, phase two is a Pheasant barn.

Hunters have ruined the Outback using their own equipment?

Hunters will ruin the rest of the Outback once pheasant barn is complete (apparently it’s already been ruined?).

The board has neglected canal clean outs, fire mitigation & nearly all other duties to secretly conspire about quail & pheasant barns.

I’ve recently driven the Outback and it certainly doesn’t appear ruined to me. Each time I visit the quail barn I wish to get a list of members responsible for volunteering their time, money & effort. I would like to thank each of them for adding a valuable asset to my community at no cost to me.

A personal concern. Should I invest around $70,000 to build a new hangar & give it to the Indian Hammock Hunt & Riding Club

what happens if a small group decides to exterminate airplanes from the Hammock?

Thanks David

Jon Albertson
Lot 47
406-465-2884
glf5@me.com

Upcoming Vote to Allow Online Voting in IH

Leave a reply

A letter to all IH Membership
From: Joe Coyle Lot 106/181.
Topic: Upcoming Vote to Allow Online Voting in IH.
Hello to all my fellow Indian Hammock members. I have asked, as a member of Indian Hammock since 2017, have requested to the owner of the Indian Hammock Owners’ Rights Facebook site and website to please post this message to all followers regarding the facts of allowing Online Voting in Indian Hammock.

As many of you know, I was tasked to research and recommend a company, and
related online voting platform, that could fit the needs of our Indian Hammock membership to allow more members to attend virtually, and vote virtually and electronically, in IH meetings, especially the annual members meeting.

The goal, and only goal, of this research was to allow members who could not physically attend, to be able to leverage their right to vote from anywhere in the world, on a secure, member verified, platform where all votes are anonymous.
I am confident we have identified that system. Also, while researching, another goal was for online voting to be additive, meaning in no way does it bypass the voting process for members that we have now, but only adds the ability to vote remotely and electronically, with full knowledge of any changes or motions executed during the actual meeting.
Finally, with the addition of our recent audio and video technologies, members can now attend meetings virtually, and vote in real time from anywhere in the world, safely, securely, and anonymously, while being 100% verified as the actual member executing the voting.
I hope you all find this intuitive, and a good starting point for the many questions I am sure are waiting to be asked.
I will break down my writing into groups, hopefully for clarity.

Why Introduce Online Voting:
To summarize along with the above statements, here are the highlights:
* Online Voting increases member participation on average by 75%
* You will be able to watch, listen, and participate in the meeting including voting with your vote, and any proxies, from anywhere in the world where you have internet access
* You can still vote in person.
* Proxies are fully supported, but hopefully will minimize “Proxy Harvesting”.
At our last annual meeting, 4 members controlled approximately 25% of the votes

It should also be mentioned that the 2024 BOD members voted unanimously to hold a special member meeting to ask membership to approve online voting. And finally, this is an additive solution and does not remove the current solution.

The Company:
The company selected to support online voting in IH, if approved, is Survey & Ballot Systems. Their website with a wealth of information is: Election Management Solutions & Voting Software | SBS Based in Minnesota, and with over 30 years in the election business, they are more than qualified in the industry. Their product, called DirectVoteLive, is a “Software as a Service” (SaaS) offering that is used by many clubs, HOA’s, Nonprofits, Churches, Credit Unions, and even Governments across the USA. They are fully licensed and certified, including in the great state of Florida.

The Technology Platform:
The technology Platform “DirectVoteLive” is state of the art, supporting industry-leading security including Transport Layer Security (TLS) encryption, and is SOC2-compliant, which are the current standards for managing personal data. Happy to explain any of this in detail to any member.

The service runs on the Microsoft Azure Cloud, which is world class and runs workloads for companies around the world.

A few words about Software as a Service or (SaaS). SaaS has been around in the industry since the 1960’s although until the personal computer came into play, almost no one knew of it, or what it did, unless you are old like me and worked in the mainframe computing days. Today, SaaS is everywhere, used by everyone, every day. During the technology boom of the late 1990’s and 2000’s, two important technologies released the feasibility, and the availability of SaaS. Those technologies were Global Networking, and Cloud Computing. These two technologies becoming commodities launched SaaS. So, what is SaaS? Simply, it is software that runs in the Cloud, and as offered to, as a service, companies or individuals. The software remains under the control of the owner, in this case Survey & Ballots, and is presented to people via an online interface, for controlled usage. There is no installation, no CD’s or DVD’s, no updates need to be done, and no access to the underlying code. You get access to what you pay for, and nothing else. Some other examples, there are many, like the bank access everyone uses in your browser, Salesforce, ADP Payroll, the Google search engine, etc. There are thousands. SaaS is what we are recommending.

We have rented the platform for 1 year, with unlimited elections. With renewals entirely up to IH.

What the SaaS Platform Does:
In summary and as stated above, the platform allows verified members to vote in elections remotely and unanimously from anywhere in the world with an internet connection. Securely and confidently. Some more details:
* The election committee runs the election as always, verifies the members and any proxies, and loads that information into the system under the election.
Proxies are also loaded in, so if a member assigns their vote to another member,
that assigned member has an additional vote, just like the paper process.
* By default, all elections are anonymous and are stated as such on every screen and report. Period.
* Members are verified by the election committee prior to the election, and the system
verifies the members in real time by sending a specific link to members for access. No link is the same, and the links are only sent to verified member devices.
* In real-time, the election committee can load in for example additional BOD members
elected on the floor for office, any motion made in real time by members for vote at the
meeting, etc.
* All information regarding an election can be loaded into the system so remote voters have the same access to information as those attending in person.
* All members are notified electronically if any new motions, etc. are approved at the
meeting. So even members not watching via audio/video will be notified in real-time should another vote be needed.
* For those attending the meeting, voting results will be displayed in real-time at the meeting on our monitor for all to see. For remote voters, they can see the same on their devices. At the end of the meeting, all results are distributed via report to registered voters via the same link that was supplied.

I would also like to mention that Survey & Ballots also offers a comprehensive hands-on service, where they send a team on site to run the entire election, using the same software, via their team, thereby freeing up our election committee, for a price!

What the SaaS Platform Does Not Do:
Again, as stated previously:

* The platform will not expose who votes, and that information is not available to anyone, including the administrator executing the election process.
* Will not allow any manipulation of the voting, by anyone, including the platform owners.
* Does not restrict in any way how IH runs elections. It only offers a more efficient way to execute the election.

Our Testing Process:
As many are aware, the elections committee has performed several tests, including 2 tests with the entire membership, to prove our goal of adding online voting both securely and anonymously. Many of you have already participated. This is the reason the BOD voted to rent the platform for a year, to demonstrate to membership, using the actual productive platform, that we can add remote online voting to our current election process.

How Much Does It Cost IH to Leverage?
We have purchased the “rental” of the platform for 1-year, unlimited number of elections, for approximately $530.00. 1-year renewals are at our discretion, with no obligation. I am sure prices will vary year by year, but their prices have been consistent over the years, with only minor fluctuations. The price we negotiated also includes a TXT message add-on, that allows us to notify members in real-time via TXT along with the included email in the standard package.

Some Additional Information:
It should be noted that even for members attending the meeting onsite, you can STILL vote using the online platform. This is the best of both worlds as you are there in real-time, but can use your phone, tablet, laptop, to vote, not having to fill out ballots with pen, rip off certain colored paper to vote on motions, etc.

Expecting people to choose to vote electronically even while onsite, the BOD and yours truly have agreed to install a Starlink internet system at the lodge, which all but guarantees us that every member attending can leverage online voting at the lodge, without worry of bandwidth issues.
Image how much this platform will speed to vote counting, especially as more members choose to vote on the platform versus paper. No more trying to fill the hours of dead air while manual counting occurs.

To Summarize:
I would like to start by thanking David Etzion for allowing this post to his followers to happen, as I want to get the facts to as many members as possible.

I would also like to stress that this post comes from Joe Coyle the member, and in no way has any ties to the BOD, where I also serve the community for this year.

I am more than happy to make myself available to anyone who has additional questions or would like to discuss anything in more detail. Please reach out and I will spend the time.

And, we have an extremely knowledgeable election committee that is now well versed in this platform, has run mock elections, and is another great resource to connect with for any details or questions.

Finally, visit the Survey & Ballots website at: Election Management Solutions & Voting Software |SBS There is a wealth of information available including other users’ comments, case studies, etc.
It is worth your time, so you are self-informed prior to the meeting on Sunday, December 15th.

So, let’s get this done. And hopefully let’s not let 4 members control 25% of the outcome of this decision of allowing online voting.

Thank you all and God Bless.

Joe Coyle

Lot 106/181.

Cell and email on our IH website.

Online Voting at Indian Hammock

Leave a reply

I received an email from Corey Miller (Lot 29), which is too important not to put on record. Here it is in Corry’s own words.

Dear neighbors,
Indian Hammock is celebrating its 50th anniversary this year! Over those years many things have changed, including the ability to vote electronically. I am writing to you about the upcoming On-Line voting decision.I am fully supporting this because

1.       Online voting increases member participation by 75%!

2.       Your Board unanimously voted to have a special membership meeting to vote on this, we need 196 votes to pass this.

3.       You will be able to watch, listen and participate in meetings

4.       You can still vote in person

5.       Proxies are still allowed, but will minimize “Proxy Harvesting” (at our last annual  controlled 4 members controlled approximately 25% of the votes)

6.       Voting is secure and secret – NO ONE can access how you voted!

My wife Lauren and I have been members for over 30 years. We enjoy shotgun shooting sports, Lauren enjoys horseback riding and I enjoy being on the finance committee (fun guy!)

Thank you for taking the time to read this. Please support the motion.

Thank you,

Corey Miller, Lot 29– 

Rule 1-1 The End

Leave a reply

On February 13, 2021, I single-handedly started a campaign to remove the abusive Rule 1-1 and replace it with a rule granting the owners control of their lots.
This was my main goal for all the Owners in Indian Hammock.
See the full story: https://ihmyhome.com/category/book_of_rules/rule-1-1/

On January 21, 2024, The Club Board of Directors scraped the abusive Rule 1-1 and replaced it with Rule 1-2 in the amended Book of Rules.

Thank you, David Bass and Joe Coyle, for leading a better board of directors and achieving this goal.  

The new Rule 1-2 declares.
The Club shall have the responsibility and authority in the management and maintenance of all Common Area for the benefit of all members of the Club.
Each Owner/Member shall have the responsibility and authority in the management and maintenance of their lot, subject to the deed restrictions adopted in the Declaration of Restrictions governing document.
The Club shall be managed and controlled by the Board. Only the Board can obligate the Club, and the President must review and sign all contracts.

Rule 1-1 Case – Update 2022-09-13

1 Reply

The Club’s lawyer submitted a Legal Opinion about my suggested change to Rule 1-1
You can find the complete document below.

The Legal Opinion declares, I quote:
“the Club has exclusive responsibility and authority for the management and maintenance of all the property within the Club, including the Residential Lots”
This opinion should be made known to all of the 299 lot owners, as I believe many of us think that we have a say in the management and maintenance of the lots we bought.

I disagree with the Club’s Legal Opinion and find fault with the points the Club’s lawyer raised in order to justify Rule 1-1.

These are my points and argument:

My proposed change does not limit the Club’s exclusive responsibility and authority for the common grounds. See the first sentence in my proposed change.

As for the Declaration of Restrictions Article III Section 1. 
My proposed change allows the Club the enforcement of the terms, conditions, and covenants related to the privately owned 299 lots, see in my proposed change “subject to the deed restrictions set up in the declaration of Restriction”

As for the Declaration of Restrictions Article III, Section 3.
My change removes the EXCLUSIVE from the Club’s authority on each of the 299 privately owned lots; REASONABLE authority is a different story.

As for the Club’s Bylaws Article IV, Section 1.
This section is about THE PROPERTY OF THE CLUB, being the common areas and any of the 299 lots still owned by the Club; it does not say THE PROPERTY OF THE CLUB and the RESIDENTIAL LOTS. See Article I General for some definitions.

As for the Bylaws Article IV Section 10.
I don’t see what it has to do with the proposed change.

The proposed change takes nothing from The Bylaws and the Article of Corporation.
The laws of the State of Florida (and the Federal laws) supersede the Club documents and any of the Club’s rules. The proposed change includes “subject to the deed restrictions set up in the declaration of Restriction”

As for the Bylaws Article IV, Section 10.
I agree that the Board of Directors shall manage the Affair of the Club, but not the Affair of the Owner.

I am not a lawyer, and I believe I got to the end of my ability to convince the Club to correct what is wrong in this matter.

I have sent all of the information to my lawyer and I am awaiting his advice.

brooks2.let_-1Download

Update 2022-08-30 Club’s Violation – Rule1-1

2 Replies

As of February 2021, I am arguing the issue of Owners’ Rights in Indian Hammock.
The best example of the Club encroaching on Owners’ Rights is the Club Rule 1-1 in its Book of Rules.

The Club insists it has exclusive authority in managing my lot 246, precisely as it has exclusive authority in managing Indian Hammock common ground.
I bought, paid for, and got a fee simple deed to my Lot 246 in Indian Hammock; yet another party claims it has the sole control in managing my Property.

The Club based its view on the Indian Hammock Declaration of restrictions, and
I argue that the Club’s interpretation of the relevant clause in the Declaration of restrictions is wrong.
If the Club’s interpretation is correct, this applicable clause in the Declaration of Restrictions contradicts real estate ownership law, making it invalid.

On 2022-08-24, I met with the Club’s President and the Club’s Manager; the same day, I submitted the following:

 Dear Tom and Bob,
In our Meeting today, I proposed changing Rule 1-1 to say:

“The Club shall have the exclusive responsibility and authority in the management and maintenance of the common ground for the benefit of all the members. Each member shall have the exclusive responsibility and authority in the management and maintenance of their lot, subject to the deed restrictions set up in the Declaration of Restrictions. The Club shall be managed and controlled by the Board. Only the Board can obligate the Club, and the President must sign all contracts.”

I explained my interpretation of the Declaration of Restrictions and why I think such a change in Rule 1-1 does not contradict the law of the land and the Declaration of Restrictions.

See also Rule 1-1 and my Interpretations to the Declaration of Restrictions (February 18, 2021)

I don’t have the legal expertise to produce a professional legal opinion about this issue, nor does the club board of directors.
As discussed, the Club will contact its lawyer and request a legal Report/Opinion about the issue. Such a report will be made known to all of the owners.
If the report supports my interpretation, Rule 1-1 will be voted on to be changed accordingly.
If the report supports the current Rule 1-1, stating that an owner has no say whatsoever in the management of his Property, then all efforts should be made to call a special member meeting and put this issue to vote.

Knowing that a change to the Declaration of Restriction requires 200 votes, the club lawyer should be consulted about doing the voting by mail or any way that will encourage high participation of owners.

As mentioned, I will be happy to meet with the Club’s lawyer to discuss.

Please confirm receiving. 

Regards
David Etzion
Lot 246

On 2022-08-25, The Club advised me that it forward my email to the Club’s lawyer.
I await the Club’s lawyer’s input within two weeks and will keep updating this page.

Indian Hammock Hunt and Riding Club’s Manager Office

1 Reply

About two years ago, I tried to get information and learn about the Indian Hammock Hunt and Riding Club’s (IH) Manager’s Office.

I could not find Work Descriptions for IH employees in the Manager’s Office.
I found a big folder containing many documents covering “Manager’s Responsibilities” and tasks, practically making the Manager responsible for “all that may happen in this world.”

IH Management Office can’t have one individual responsible for Legal Compliance and Law Enforcement, Managing the maintenance of IH facilities and Projects.
These two different tasks require individuals with different qualifications.

I am calling for a change in the Manager’s Office.

There should be two appointees:
1. Work Manager
2. Legal and Enforcement Manager

Work Manager
The Work Manager should have experience managing maintenance, construction, project, and accounting skills.
The Work Manager should manage the Facilities and Projects in the Common Areas, utilizing IH employees, equipment, and subcontractors.

Legal and Enforcement Manager
The Legal and Enforcement Manager should be an experienced lawyer specializing in Homeowners’ Association Law.
The Legal and Enforcement Manager should supervise the Club’s Board of Directors (BOD) and Members’ meetings and restrain BOD’s members from acting in contradiction to the Club’s documents.
Should ensure that claimed violation will be dealt with per the procedures in the Club’s Documents.
Should supervise that Club’s Rules and Committee’s SOP will align with the Club’s Declaration of Restrictions and By-Laws.

IH doesn’t have a Legal and Enforcement Manager, and IH Work Manager is not qualified to and cannot carry out the Legal and Enforcement tasks.

The Legal and Enforcement Manager should be “appointed by the people” (The Owners), not the “Local Government” (The Club’s BOD). He can be proposed by the Club’s BOD or any Owner but must be voted in and approved by the owners and can’t be dismissed or replaced by the Club’s BOD without the owners’ approval.

Unless done, the Club will accumulate more court cases and legal costs.

Indian Hammock Homeowners Group

1 Reply

The Indian Hammock Hunt and Riding Club, Inc (the Club) is a Florida corporation formed on December 20, 1973.
In 1973 the Club filed Three governing documents:

  1. Articles of Incorporation.
  2. Declaration of Restrictions. (Amended and restated later, on November 2, 1998)
  3. The By Law.

These three documents established a governing system (the System) for the operation and governing of the Club.
A Forth Document, The Book of Rules or Club Rules, appeared much later.
It was not created with legal expertise and was changed and rewritten at will by the Club’s various Board of Directors.

The System was created to govern members utilizing the Club amenities like Hunting, Horse riding, Shooting, and Flying small Airplanes. Those members were camping on the bought lots or in weekend retreat bungalows.
No one can purchase a lot or a home in Indian Hammock without joining the Club.

About a quarter of Indian Hammock’s 3,600 acres was sold to members. The Club owns the remaining three quarters, with an obligation to manage the common areas for the benefit of all the members.
The members have “Ownership” of the common areas and the right to use them via their memberships in the Club.

Things have changed in half a century; we are now primarily a Residential Community of Homeowners, many living in Indian Hammock full time.
The System is unsuitable for Homeowners living in Indian Hammock full-time or part-time.

Over the years, the System developed a Club’s lawless culture, creating injustices like:

I am calling for forming an Indian Hammock Homeowners Group (the Group), consisting of homeowners who are ready to work together to change the existing System while following and obeying the three documents of 1973.

Until the System is changed, the Group will finance obtaining legal advice and take legal actions whenever the Club acts illegally or unjustly.

T Mobile Home Internet & Calyx Institute – MiFi M2000

Leave a reply
Speed test in Indian Hammock taken at the Lodge
Speed test at the Indian Hammock taken at the Office complex

I used the M2000 to test the internet speed in two locations in Indian Hammock

M2000 serve as a Hot Spot that can be used anywhere in the USA
This High-Speed Internet Service can be ordered online at:
https://calyxinstitute.org/membership/devices/mifi-m2000

This device is available at the Sustainer membership level.
The MiFi M2000 supports nearly all bands used by T-Mobile and Sprint and it utilizes the T-Mobile network.

For service at a fixed address in Indian Hammock, the T Mobile Home Internet can be ordered online https://www.t-mobile.com/isp/get-started